Friday, October 29, 2010

Be assured: Sangh is capable of creation, destruction & recreation too.

Be assured: Sangh is capable of creation, destruction & recreation too.
- Mukund, Pranth Pracharak, Karnatak Dakshin, RSS


" If the political party started by Sangh gets corrupt, the Sangh has the strength to destroy it.”-
-Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay,

The recent political developments in Karnataka are disappointing to those having social concern. Those anticipating a good future for the country have been disappointed by the leaders of all political parties who have been acting as if corruption, immorality and horse trading are the inevitable features of politics.

As a Swayamsevak of Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh, I feel that there is an urgent need in responding to this situation. There are two reasons: firstly, among the rulers of this state, there are some who have contacts with the Sangh. The common men measure their activities from the point of view of the Sangh too. Secondly, there is no mechanism in RSS to publicize its internal discussions.

I’m writing this article thinking that it would be better to share such views (for the second reason) since I am closely working with the senior activists of the sangh for many years and I have some information about the recent political developments.

The Sangh does not agree with all the activities or resolutions of the BJP and the government in the state either ‘in principle’ or ‘in practice’. The Sangh opposes corruption, horse trading and unethical decisions. Just like the RSS activists welcome the prohibition of cow slaughter, they oppose the SEZ. Just like the Sangh elders appreciate those MLAs who do not earn a single paise for themselves despite being elected as MLAs for many terms, they express their anguish towards those who are corrupt. They even convey their resent to such persons in strong words.

What is the use in just expressing anger? Some action should be taken- this is the stand of many people. Inner transformation is the way Sangh adopts to encourage the Swayamsevaks. May it be the efforts to root out the caste system or corruption, inner change is the ultimate solution. Many Sangh leaders work from this view point for the past many years. This effort continues irrespective of whether there is BJP government in the state or not.

Lakhs of Swayamsevaks have passed in first class after they learn about good conduct, ethics and social concern in the university of Sangh, but at the same time, there are people who have ‘failed’ in the social life. In such cases, self-effort by these people is more important than the support of the co-Swayamsevaks. We should not forget that those whom the common men perceive as ‘clean’ in the present state cabinet are all the Swayamsevaks of Sangh.

Many people talk about the frequent visits of the State BJP leaders to ‘Keshavakrupa’, the RSS office in Bangalore. Hence, they ask us why can’t we question such persons and give them strong advice. Yes, the Sangh expresses its opinion with those people in accordance with its ‘stands’ mentioned above. Many a time this message is conveyed in strong words too. It is not proper to deny entry to anybody to Keshavakripa. The doors of Sangh are wide open to people from all walks and sectors of the society any time. It is a regular phenomenon that not just the BJP leaders, but also the leaders of other political parties, people who do not agree with the principles of Sangh, intellectuals, litterateurs and social activists- hundreds of people visit the office every day. Being a social organization, the Sangh cannot close its doors to anybody. Still, the Sangh has informed people concerned recently that it is not appropriate to visit the Sangh office only to discuss the ‘political strife’ with a note that it would lead to the opinion that Sangh has its nod to all the activities of the BJP. (There is another issue here: Whether some people visit the Sangh office or not, it does not make any difference in the moral responsibility of the Swayamsevaks. Isn’t their meeting with the Sangh leaders inevitable at least to caution them on their acts?)

Now, the matter of Sangh ‘taking any action’: all those who know about the functioning of Sangh, also know the relationship between Sangh and different organizations. May it be matters related to the policies of the organizations, or to the individual behavior, the activists of the organizations themselves rectify the mistakes and take decisions that are good for the society. The advices of Sangh should be implemented by those people holding responsibilities in such organizations. For example, when the Sangh leaders advised the BJP to bring youngsters to the key positions of the party, it selected Nithin Gadkari as its national president. Similarly, the Sangh has been pressing its Swayamsevaks in the BJP to give an administration that is free of corruption, in accordance with the culture and values and to build a party with persons having good conduct. It is their responsibility to implement them. (Selection of the president is an internal and organizational process of an organization. But issues like corruption and government policy is a vast subject that depends on the mindset of the present society. A corruption-free administrative system will only be representative of the society, but cannot originate from zero. This fact strengthens the Sangh’s belief of ‘social transformation through character building or that which Swami Vivekananda called “Man Making Mission”.

To speak about the present political scenario in the state – when the BJP leaders visited the Sangh office to inform the ongoing political developments, one of the Sangh heads suggested them to dissolve the government and to go to the people. They also advised them to drop the tainted persons from key positions. It is the implementers who should have the will to do so. The Sangh itself cannot do it. In the democratic system adopted by the country, a political party has its own way of functioning. More importantly, there is ‘politics’. It is not proper to be deceived because of one’s own goodness. At the same time, the Sangh does not agree with those following the unethical path in the name of political strategy.

The recent statements of the BJP’s opposition party leaders (Sangh does not have any opposition party) that the Sangh should advise the BJP leaders, have been reported in the newspapers. It is evident here that even the rivals of the BJP have perceived that the Sangh has the moral power to advise a political party like BJP. It has been reported that an important political leader of the state said in a press conference that the RSS should advise the BJP regarding the ‘purchase’ of MLAs. The political leader who made the statement is also involved in the ‘business’. This is just like the ‘enlightenment’ happened in Karna when his chariot got stranded at the war front.

Sangh has its own method of thinking for the purpose of upholding morality in the society. Corruption can be rooted out only when transformation takes place among politicians, officials, businessmen and common men. If any one of the parties here is corrupt, the system cannot be transformed. The Sangh is into efforts to create good leadership in all the four groups. It is true that good virtues should percolate from top to bottom. But the number of people with good virtues should increase in the society. They cannot be there only at the top. Hence, the Sangh has been striving towards developing virtues among the individuals continuously.

Once, a Swayamsevak asked Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay, who entered a political party as a Sangh Swayamsevak and seeded a new ideology and culture there: “There is a saying that power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Will it not happen if the leaders of Janasangh get power?” Deendayal said: “It is possible”. The Swayamsevak again asked: “Then, what is the hope for the future?” Deendayal replied: “The strength of Sangh”. He continued: “If the political party started by Sangh gets corrupt, the Sangh has the strength to destroy it.”

“Well, if it happens again?” the Swayamsevak asked once again. Deendayal smiled and said: “Haven’t you heard the story of Parashurama who circumambulated the earth 21 times in order to destroy the Kshatriyas? Until Rama incarnated, Parashurama did not rest. Therefore, the strength of Sangh – the strength of good people of this country is not at all helpless. Have faith in that. The Sangh has the strength of destruction like Parashurama and creation also. It has the maturity to decide, when the time requires.”

The ultimate target of Sangh is not ‘one government or one chief minister or one prime minister’. But it is the building of an organized society based on Bharatiya cultural values. The Sangh has treaded on a confident path all these eight and a half decades. It is satisfied with the transformation achieved so far. Lakhs of Swayamsevaks are involved in the mission of social transformation across the country. This is reflected in a total of 1.53 lakh service activities, 32,000 educational institutions and activities of reformation in thousands of tribal dwellings all across the country. ‘Forming a government’ or ‘a political party’ is just a small part of this vast canvas. Hence, the well wishers of Sangh and the opposition party persons of the BJP need not worry.

- Mukund, Pranth Pracharak, RSS

(Article in Vijay Karnataka dated 25-10-2010. Page 9 –translated-)






Even the Vathsale will not Pardon RSS


(Summary of article by Pratap Simha in Vijaya Karnataka 23.10.2010)



On 30th May 2008, when B.S.Yedyurappa took over as 19th Chief Minister of Karnataka, people of Karnataka and in particular, BJP voters were very happy. Party workers celebrated the occasion as if they got the power. People started identifying themselves with the government. In the aftermath of Haveri firing, farmers protest in Davanagere and Operation Lotus which is intended to stabilize the government, people defended the BJP and its government.



But after two and half years, situation has changed. Especially after the resignation of Justice Santhosh Hegde, people started feeling ashamed of the government. Now, it has worsened. BJP karyakarthas are apologetically admitting the heightened corruption in government machinery.



While these things are happening, Sangh Karyakarthas, always in the midst of people - who go the houses associated with Sangh and have food with them on a daily basis, not aware of these things?



It is not so.



Sangh Karyakarthas are very much unhappy about these developments. They are helpless. They have no role to set right these things. But, RSS leaders at National (and state) are capable of taking action. But why are they not doing anything? If they continue to maintain that BJP is not in their control, and refuse to do something, people will lose trust even in them. RSS, which is capable of ensuring ascent of state level leader Nitin Gadkari, who was unknown at the National level, should be able to do something about a BJP government of a state. It should not cite its media policy as an excuse. It would lose respect by refusing to shoulder political responsibility in the pretext of a socio cultural organization. If BJP is a party with difference (now, certainly it is not) then it is because of its RSS roots. But why Sangh Parivar organizations are not taking any steps to correct this situation? Have they compromised their principles to protect the BJP government in Karnataka?



In 1998, the then prime minister A. B. Vajapayee who had Sangh background, refused to indulge in corrupt practices and his government was defeated by one vote. By then, P.V. Narasimha Rao had already set the precedence of buying MPs to win the Vote of confidence. But Vajapayee practiced politics adhering to moral principles.

In the present of deteriorated state politics, Operation Lotus cannot be condemned too harshly. But who is responsible for a situation which made resuming of the Operation Lotus a necessity?

Still, why is there a silence in RSS?

Sangh always takes a firm stance against terrorism, conversions and Jihad. They advocate tough line of action against Pakistan and China. But why are they not taking similar firm stance against corruption? Have they forgotten the lessons learnt from the ill effects of corrupt practices adopted by British? Why do they not understand that illegal ore exporters cannot be different from Mir Jaffers of history? Has RSS, which shares emotional bonding with the land of this country, stooped to consciously support the land grabbers of Karnataka government?



Is there no precedent where RSS criticizes BJP government? No. Modi government in Gujarat was severely criticized by many Sangh Parivar organizations when it demolished road side temples that were illegally built.



B.S.Yedyurappa may be inevitable for the BJP government in Karnataka and for the state BJP. But this is the time to act so that next two years, Karnataka people will get a good government. Sangh should do something. If they don’t act, even the kind goddess - mother of the land, whom they pray everyday, will not pardon them.

(Summary of article by Pratap Simha in Vijaya Karnataka 23.10.2010)

No comments: