Save Ram sethu, save Hindu: The Dharma Surkhshya Samiti

Bhubaneswar, 15/10/08 (VISAKEO): Reacting to the statement of the government regarding Ram Sethu "the mythological Rama Setu bridge is not an essential" and "integral part of Hindu religion", The Dharma Surkhshya Samiti state Secretary Sri Golak Das has resented against the government's a kind of politics in the name of secularism. He has strongly opposed to such statement against the government's report that has been delivered to the supreme court of India.

Against the backdrop of the wicked politician's conspiracy not to sustain the holy Ram Sethu, Sri Das said, because of few tainted diplomats and the working government's monopoly policy about Hindu religion, all our heritage is under the threat. Because of government's anti nationalism and sympathetic attitude towards the minorities in spite of their criminal activities in the nation, the clash between Hindu and Christian took place, therefore, Kandhamal is now National and international media's headline. We can never tolerate such kind of impartiality in a secular State like India. Always Hindus and their heritage are under the question by various political parties. Not other religion is objected from on the culture and traditional point of view. The most ancient religion of the world seems to go under the dooms day. Explaining the government's report to the SC "It has not been proved undoubtedly to be the belief of the Hindu community that Lord Rama did not himself break the bridge. Nor has it been established that whatever remains of the Rama Setu as a piece of worship is an essential and integral part of the Hindu religion," the State Secretary of the Organisation stated, it is the country's misfortune as well as of the Hindu community to receive such irrational and false output by the government about Lord Ram and his real picture and incarnation is going to be proved as false at the door of human society. The present report of the government clearly put the question of Lord Ram's biological and true existence in Indian mythology. If Ram Sethu will be questioned, what about the existence of other Lords and saints of other religion? Why their heritage are secured and maintained and declared as the tourist place? However the report said, the opponents of the project have not proved that Rama Setu forms an "integral" and "essential" part of Hindu religion and has to be protected, and "A religious belief or practise which is not an essential and integral part of the religion is not protected by Article 25 or 26 of the Constitution"